Home Real Estate Nissan Ariya driving REVIEW – suddenly the best EV ?? 😮

Nissan Ariya driving REVIEW – suddenly the best EV ?? 😮

44
Nissan Ariya driving REVIEW – suddenly the best EV ?? 😮

This is our in-depth review of the Nissan Ariya (new Nissan EV). We’re taking a look at Exterior, Interior and the driving experience.

►Follow us on Instagram @autogefuehl and @thomas.letsgo
►Subscribe here:
►Compare the Ioniq 5:
►Compare the Kia EV6:
►Compare the Tesla Model 3:

00:00 Nissan Ariya a game changer?
00:29 Ariya colors blue, green copper
01:05 Wheels and design
01:40 Battery sizes kWh
02:03 Length and rear
02:17 FWD vs AWD
02:37 Top speed Vmax
02:49 Suspension and rear axle
03:04 AC / DC recharging with charging curve
03:31 Is there a frunk?
03:41 Ariya naming background Aryan?
04:28 Key fob and doors
05:22 Lounge interior with microfibre seats
06:34 Seating position
07:02 Panoramic roof
07:37 BOSE sound system
08:04 Moving lower middle console
09:23 Electric cubby hole
10:53 Interior overview
11:20 Wooden capacitive climate controls
12:15 Adjustable steering
12:50 Digital instruments
13:31 Head-up-Display (HUD)
13:41 Infotainment system details
15:04 Heated and coole microfibre seats
15:26 Digital back mirror function
15:57 Rear seats
17:25 Trunk / boot with length and width
18:26 Nissan Ariya FWD acceleration
20:22 Agility vs comfort
21:22 Recuperation modes with e-pedal
22:32 Heated windscreen
23:22 User interface while driving
23:58 Steering feel
24:14 Suspension verdict
25:30 Noise insulation
26:28 Ariya vs competitor comparison
29:53 Assistance systems
31:03 Passenger driving experience
32:45 First energy consumption test
34:55 kWh / 100 km and real world range

#Nissan #NissanAriya

Transparency note: Autogefühl videos are independent and free from editorial influence on opinion and rating. But since manufacturers enable us to do the reviews in the first place, for legal reasons this video is marked as _advertisement_.

►FULL REVIEWS 2022 Q2

►FULL REVIEWS 2022 Q1

►FULL REVIEWS 2021 Q4

How to support Autogefühl?
►Subscribe, activate notifications (bell symbol) and bookmark our direct channel:
►Support us on Patreon:
►Exclusive supporter: Ajlan Saeed

What is Thomas wearing?
► Noah shoes
Autogefühl viewers get a 20 % shoe discount with the following code: Autogefuehl-20

Social Media & Blog
►Facebook:
►Twitter:
►Instagram:
►Instagram:
►German Blog:

Autogefühl is your no. 1 resource for in-depth car reviews and your no. 1 community to discuss cars.” Each year we present you 150 cars from every segment and from a wide range of brands. If you have any suggestion, just write a comment or contact us on our other socials. Even if you have further remarks, just let us know.

source

44 COMMENTS

  1. FWD is much better than RWD for EV range. The car can regen much harder thanks to the weight change to the front axle. Worse acceleration but better regen. More should do FWD only, unbelivable that so few offer it. and AWD is the most unessesary thing ever for family cars with modern ESC systems

  2. The wheel size and features make no difference in the Canadian market. What counts is price, range (especially in winter) and reliability. Nissan Rogue is so popular here, when you have city and suburban drivers who have a driveway and can plug-in easily, and the lowest cost for hydro in North America (Quebec).. You have a recipe for absolute success.

  3. Nice review and good style of review. How would you rate refinement or comfort of ride in this compared to say an EQA? Refinement was noted as quite stiff in early UK reviews in pre production here.

  4. Good review as usual. Im glad Nissan has stepped-up to the plate since their Leaf had fallen into anonymity and obsolescence. Personally, in this EV segment I think the Ionic 5 is a better car. Its, space packaging is 2nd to none. I also think, designwise its a more interesting car. On the same driving conditions efficiency is similar and charging is better.

  5. Great review as always BUT i think you should start talking about the battery technology as well Since they are coming up with so many new battery technologies.
    I mean we are hearing about 1milion miles batteries and 10min charging. i wouldnt wanna buy a car with old lithium ion batteries while solid state batteries or whatever they are doing is booming if you know what i mean.
    I love your channel keep it up. Great work as always.

  6. Why the Germens or Iranians be ashamed of their race or heritage. These are both great Civilizations and have contributed to humanity a great deal and is continuing to do so.

  7. Nice car. Nice accent. Germans are indeed Aryans so I don't see any problem with the name. This car will sell very well in Murica because of its name .

  8. I agree with the testdriver about the name I thought the same!!But luckily the historical knowledge is very poor.Further I say very nice car,very good testdriver.I wil think about it .In my country gasoline price is €2,50.!

  9. It appears that headroom is going to be a problem for the Ariya for drivers over 6 feet tall. I am 6’3” and one of the first things I test in any car is whether or not I have enough headroom. I sat in the Ioniq 5 and VW ID.4 on dealer’s lots (both of which were pre-sold, otherwise I would have bought either of them) and was pleased to find more than ample headroom. Otherwise the Ariya looks like a very attractive EV. By the way, I don’t see why Germans have a problem with a pronunciation that sounds like Aryan when their largest auto manufacturer dates directly back to Adolf Hitler’s plan to develop a “people’s car” — translation Volkswagen) to ordinary German families.

  10. 34:55 Efficiency.
    I see an average of 47 km/h.
    When driving with, could reach wit nearly 100 km/h (under perfect conditions) 510 km this speed with my original hyunday ioniq premium (2017 model) I'll go with less than 110 wh/km under ideal conditions.
    My other car, the ioniq 5 AWD limited will use less than 160 wh /km with double speed…95 km/h under these conditions.
    My previous LR car, a Kona64, has a record for 135wh/km with a driving speed of 100 km/h under perfect conditions.

    I'm not impressed for this usage…disappointed even.

    (There is a reason that I switche from the Nissan leaf (model 2013) to hyundai EV's..the most important reason is the lack of efficiency in Nissan EV cars.)

  11. When you spoke about the name, I recalled similar situations, like in Spain mitsubishi pajero is sold as montero, because pajero in spanish means wanker. In russia renault captur is sold as Kaptur, because otherwise it can be misread as "sartir" in russian, what means toilet. In Portugal hyundai kona is sold under the same name, but the word "cona" (sounds the same as kona) means "count" without "o". This situation happens everywhere.

  12. sigh ….. Physics/maths is not hard. It's also not magic. That range at the end of 13kWh per 100km is never going to be acheivable in real world use….even Nissan claim up to 276Wh per km in the real world (depending on temp..see below). Which is 27.6kWh per 100km….giving a real world range of ~250Km

    It takes a certain amount of energy to move a certain mass a given distance. The energy used is converted into heat, light, sound by various forces in overcoming frictional resistances, air drag etc. If you drive up hill some is converted into potential energy. If you drive down hill some of your previously stored potential energy can be liberated for motion. But regardless there is a minimum required energy. EV's are already very energy efficient due to the way electric motors work (~99% efficient), low CD body designs,low rolling resitance tires, etc. There are a few other loses in the electrical system so actual efficiency is ~80% of energy put into the system results in kinetic energy in the vehicle.
    So we are kind of at the limit of how little energy is required to move a NEW EV with new tires etc over a flat distance, that being ~200Wh per km in theory and ~300Wh in reality

    So the problem with EV range is the energy storage and delivery technology: I.E Batteries. The problems of which are three fold technically:

    1)Energy Density.
    Lithium batteries weigh about 15kg per 1 kWh which means you need ~5Kg of battery per 1Km of distance travelled as opposed to gasoline which contains ~12.7kWh Energy per 1Kg.
    Which means that even with the much lower efficiency of an ICE (~45%) you only need ~20g of fuel per 1Km travelled
    A 60 litre gasoline tank weighs 45Kg and contains ~600kWh of energy and will net you about 600Km range…~1Km per KwH
    To acheive the same with lithium batteries would require over 3000Kg of batteries…whcih would mean all that extra weight would also need to be moved resulting in less range….
    So EV's may be in theory 2 or 3x as efficient as ICE in converting energy in into kinetic energy but that does not include the losses from production and transmission of the energy TO the vehicle in the first place. That is the central energy generation relies on less efficient energy conversion and transmission to the vehicle results in about 15% losses, resulting in a sum efficiency of Fuel (at the power plant) to kinetic energy (at the vehicle) of ~60%.

    2)Energy Profile
    Vehicles require an energy profile of Fast Charge/Slow Discharge.
    Batteries have the exact opposite profile. And no matter how much people claim to make "Super Fast chargers" you cant beat physics.
    If you charge ANY lithium battery at > 1C (1C being a measure of charge/discharge in 1 Hour and not an absolute number) you will drastically shorten the life of the battery
    If you charge it a > 5C (Ie full charge in faster than 10 minutes) for more than a few seconds you will permamently damage the battery and potentially destroy it.

    Which means your batteries can under NO circumstances be charged faster than 1 hour repeatedly without damaging them..no matter how "fast" the charger is or how small or large your batteries are. And to acheive that 1 hour charge on 3000Kg (200kWh) of batteries would of course require a 200kW charger…that is 870Amps @240V (1 phase domestic supply) or 300Amps on a 3 phase industrial supply. Essentially you would melt your House, the street and the entire neighbour hoods supply if you attempted that with home charging.

    The upshot being that no matter how "efficient" they make an EV and no matter how many batteries they ram in to it…you simply will not be able to charge it in any meaningful time.
    The maximum recommended C rating for charging a Lithium battery is 0.8C overall with a tailed off profile. So in reality the best you can expect is to charge your EV to 100% SoC is no faster than 1.5 hours regardless of capacity and charger rating.

    And then we come to cycles….Li batteries will lose about 3% capacity per year if cycled at @300 full cycles per annum.

    3) Enviroment
    Lithium batteries have a fundemental problem with temperature. It is their worst enemy.
    At temps >40C they temporarily lose capacity drastically. So on a hot summers day your 400Km range will become more like 200-300
    At temps < 0C then CANNOT be charged. Dendrites form which bridge the anode and cathode and short circuit the battery permanently destroying it.

    So basically EV's are a great idea. Batteries as a power source are not.

  13. Totally having nothing to do with the topic, but hearing you reminds me of Dieter Zetsche when he made Chrysler TV ads in the days when Daimler owned Chrysler.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here