Home Resorts Patreon COLLAPSE After Very Concerning Claims From Former Employee!

Patreon COLLAPSE After Very Concerning Claims From Former Employee!

50
Patreon COLLAPSE After Very Concerning Claims From Former Employee!

The #1 Way To Support This Channel Is Backing Me On SubscribeStar

Become A Youtube Member! It’s The #2 BEST Way To Support!

All My Socials, Guilded Chatroom & More

source

50 COMMENTS

  1. If it makes money, they'll allow it. Just like Thumbler, Twitter, Facebook(Meta), etc, do. Sure they say they don't allow it, saying it and doing something about it is far far different. So unless the accounts get flagged AND real scrutiny is brought to it, why would they do something about it? They'll "act" and quietly let it slide back on.

  2. I did not know that about Patreon. Now that the ex-employee calls that stuff out, I want to see if it has any effect. I'll also look into which alternative forms of support the artists I'm currently supporting there may or may not offer.
    Also the parents who shoot these photos of their children need to be sued. These poor kids are damaged for life, just for internet validation and creep money.

  3. I'm shocked by this video.

    By your own admission, you don't know whether the first poster was a former employee. You should have found out whether they were before giving their claims mileage.

  4. Patreon reserves the right to take down your account without notice simply because of your politics, conservative world view, in their platform or if they just find out about them anywhere else.

  5. I requested they fully delete my account and all data immediately 6 months ago. Left a very angry, “I will never use your services again!”, message. They’ve become absolutely evil.

  6. This has been known about Patreon long before that article, you can check the video covering this by Rev who covered it almost 6 months ago and even showed the accounts but censored the photos

  7. If I understand your carefully coded language correctly, the site is accused of allowing images of children which don't violate CP laws. It's possible that websites like Patreon are caught in a double bind regarding such content, in that it may be unsavory but not bannable without inviting lawsuits. And if it makes the company money, so much tighter the bind.

  8. I automatically believe the opposite of whatever the cultist from the left say, accuse, or deny about anything. If their lips are moving they are lying. Not to mention this is par for the course with these people. If you have a conservative/different opinion you're hitler, but if you're a pedo president then you're fine.

  9. I'm not sure I believe this.

    I am aware of a bunch of artists that create adult visual novels and art and there are a few of them that include artistic depictions of young-looking characters. Essentially these are cartoons and don't involve real people. But they will block the page if the cartoon doesn't look like "she" hit puberty, but sometimes they will let it pass if the story states that they are 18 or older.

    If they are this strict with cartoons, I cannot imagine them being lax with real people. I will say it's possible, just that I doubt it until I see the evidence. Even with my negative view of Patreon.

  10. Sorry, you lost me when you said: "It is a leftist company where only the leftist narrative is correct with only one truth."
    That's… because it doesn't let you comment on people? Anyone can have a Patreon, many artists do, many musicians do, many Youtubers do. There is no "political" questions when you setup a Patreon. People being blocked is something new that I haven't heard of, but considering some of the people I've seen with Patreons (including terrorist level right-wingers who constantly rant about fake conspiracies) is mind boggling that anyone would give them a platform to just be given money.

    So there is a lot you can dislike about them: the shares they take from people using it, the claims of ownership, fees they take from people, the UI, etc. But "leftist think camp" is pretty out there.

  11. Society has fallen, we are in that fall. I have no idea what the solution is other than a division of extremes. I wish we could all come together under a moderate banner and then out the elite class that has come to take our lives and our children.

  12. Hey it's Chris Hanson!!!!!
    I met him twice
    I was on the show twice
    God forbid if I walk on his show with another carton of cigarettes and a dolly with a keg of beer and a box of condoms
    for the third time 🤘🏻🤪

  13. If it's not illegal it ought not be removed or affected at all.
    BUT that has to cut across ALL categories, ESPECIALLY speech. Censoring speech bothers me more than 'questionable' pictures.**
    Typical hypocrisy from a woke corporation.

    **Clearly illegal pictures? Remove them and charge anyone responsible, of course.

  14. I've watched your stuff for awhile now, and have typically enjoyed your content. But every episode where you self-censor sends chills down my spine. While you talk about topics that are controversial and I'm sure many of your viewers enjoy that you are not afraid to make these videos, you do so while still being afraid. You're afraid that using 'bad words' will prevent you from getting your message out, but every time you self-censor for them you are spreading their message and that they are winning. By censoring yourself not only are you accepting their demands of your censorship but you are also setting the example to your viewers that censorship is acceptable. While you make good content there are many others talking about the same stuff that refuse to censor themselves and because of this you have lost me as a viewer.

  15. Madonna is slingin' pics of her adopted 17 yr old son, who is gay, in stripper outfits, with his butt twerked to the camera. … topless, rhinestone pants, matching cowboy hat, collar and cuffs… please. Aside from any laws or public considerations, she should be ashamed, and it makes you wonder about the whispers we hear about backdoor Hollywood…. peace

  16. Nothing about the parents, actually being the parents of the victims, means anything. They should get treated the same as any offender, if indeed, there are children being victimized. In fact, it's worse.

  17. Outsourcing security and other staff allows plausible deniability.
    The problem is we have people who are for exploitation of children in high level political offices and much of the intelligence community, CIA, NSA, FBI etc. It’s why they won’t release Epstein’s black book.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here