Home Immigration VERDICT COMING – Will Johnny or Amber Win?

VERDICT COMING – Will Johnny or Amber Win?

40
VERDICT COMING – Will Johnny or Amber Win?

Join this channel to get access to perks:

=============================================================

🔗LINKS🔗

Locals:
INSTAGRAM:
TikTok:
Odysee:

MERCH:

Support the Legal Mindset Channel HERE!

ETH Wallet: 0x53fdd01E2c79bE361E7c92090E0D20e165415c5C

If you concur, object or have suggestion for a topic, please leave a comment below 💬⬇️

⚠️DISCLAIMER⚠️ This is not legal advice and I cannot give you legal advice. All information presented on this channel is for informational and educational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction to obtain legal advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing on this channel should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Support of this channel or purchase of any affiliated products or services does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Any opinions expressed herein are my own and do not reflect those of any organization, association or group.

All references or clips that may be used on this channel are for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).

source

40 COMMENTS

  1. So are we Russian bots or are we all now toxic misogynistic males? I am a human woman, not a bot and definitely not a misogynist. So how do they explain that? Because I don't hate all men, believe all women (even the liars) my views and opinions are toxic, but the crazy coke hoar (hypothetically speaking) who likes to beat her significant others isn't toxic? I don't see the logic there. Their arguments are ridiculous.

  2. Re the mile high club. My first time coming home from Iraq in 04, I beat off midflight. So I used to joke I was in the half mile high club (I mean, technically I get no, but it was a solid laugh for a coming home)

  3. Good Morning from the home of Racing Newmarket UK. I hear that Marilyn Manson is bringing a lawsuit against Evan Rachel Wood defamation and some much more deeper and sinister accusations.Amber Heards counsel and herself brought this up with more people accusing him of certain acts.# stand up for Johnny Depps friend Marilyn Manson.

  4. Different Topic but important for history preservationist. It's not about superficial drama. I wrote this for a different channel. Respectfully may I share back better and post it here?✍️ Here goes ✍️
    Question? Didn't D U Know Why guy use his face as advertising? Highlighting reaction by putting a red circle around his face in the cover picture of his vedio?
    Trying to manufacturing the ham-man false OMG moment? It's okay after the fact not in front of the jury.
    However for the TMZ guy -Elaine moment. It was just a good old fashion comeback. Not a game changer or Will Smith slap by the former TMZ worker?
    Over the top demonstration stuff in the gallery is signaling to the jury. Natural sincere reactions not so much. It possibly could have been trying to fabric a opinion for the jury if Larry was performing and not really reacting.
    Back in the day and still today it's seriously important for a journalist NOT to become the story. It's the number one rule. It's not about taste or cringe alone. A person lawyer looking to grab the limelight can alter the situation in a damaging way.
    The rules about professionalism are in place for good reason. Years of evolution, trial and error and reform went into establishing professional standards we use to this day.
    A legit reporter, gets in, gets out and delivers the goods. Drama on the courthouse property with people in line is a PT Barnum sideshow.
    Maybe Legal Bytes could have did things differently but working to preserve what is working is good of her. It's good for everyone.
    A person is either a journalist or an activist in this situation. A blend of both is something different. Not good, not bad. But absolutely not needed. Not helpful when the objective is to inform and preserve history regarding the Depp – Heard trial. IMO.
    Best regards. Thanks veterans, Happy Memorial Day USA 2022🇺🇲 Go Vet! See:Ward Carroll YT Retired US Navy Top Gun Pilot search: Ward Carroll, "This Man Ejected From The Cockpit And Literally Rode The Lightening." The story telling is an example of how powerful being non-dramatic in style can be.🇺🇲🥇👍

  5. discovered you on nicks channel (rekeita law) & subbed & i love your energy! keep doing what you’re doing & bringing light to all these important discussions that need to be had
    🙏🏼

  6. Check out this case

    Charged with “incitement” (to encourage people to attend a protest during CoVid lockdown.). Already spent time in jail with bail refused. About to send her back to jail again for refusing access to her phone and computer (which holds all the details of her supporters).

    https://youtu.be/En0HfH4843s

  7. Watch the full clip of AH phantom writing. Some channels have it shortened, but the original TikTok one shows Rottenborn by her. Watch his face! It's hilarious…he even shakes his head. Asmongold channel had the long one, if still there. He has a shortened one, too.

  8. Ahead of the verdict, I am of the view that JD is unlikely to win his legal case. Defamation cases are notoriously hard to win both in the UK and in the US. This is due to the legal tests required for a successful claim. The legal thresholds are somewhat similar in both countries. JD already lost the UK case back in 2020. This illustrates that claims of this kind are not as clear cut as they may seem, irrespective of what evidence the public may perceive as important to the case. However, it is clear that he has won over the majority of the public opinion which is likely to be just as important to him, if not more.
    Again doesn’t stop the main stream media !

    The trial has been so widely reported online not just because he is famous but also because someone has potentially manipulated an important movement by relying on sex and social perspectives for personal gain. Its also been done at the expense of someone else and right in the face of survivors.

    Many of those who do find themselves falsely accused are not often privileged enough to argue their case in various forums and do not have a platform big enough to bring this particular issue to light.

    Some of the DV claims alleged in the case are (arguably) physically impossible and there is evidence undermining certain events. This has resulted in re-enactment videos being posted across the internet in attempt for social justice however many victims/survivors are being triggered by these videos. We also have some moral responsibility to think about the potential impact of the content we create and share.

    Whilst it is so important to believe victims and/or survivors, it is equally important not to pretend to be one. It is so wrong for a person to take the traumatic experiences of others and use them for personal gain (and in attempt to ruin someone). Doing so undermines the credibility and confidence of both current and future survivors.

    In my view, the ‘me too’ movement did not intend for us to believe all people (“women”) no matter what. Why should anyone do that if there is evidence to the contrary? It also did not mean that we should never believe men, especially if they are rich or powerful. There is a reason why there is a standard of proof required throughout courts and justice systems. This case is not saying that those subjected to DV should create a catalog of evidence in order to be believed, it’s highlighting a need to consider counter evidence should it exist and question inconsistencies should they also exist.

    In my personal view, AH has been dishonest. She has been unnecessarily evasive at best. The evidence supports findings of dishonesty and with dishonesty hopefully comes malice.

    Whilst I would like to see her face legal consequences, I worry she will not due to technical legalities. As a human-being I take no pleasure in seeing her being harassed and threatened online though.

    X 💙 🤞 💙

  9. That's not jury nulification. Jury nullification is when the jury goes against what the law indicated should be the verdict. For example, say a bus driver collapses and a drunk driver saves almost everyone from going over a cliff, but a few people die, a jury can decide to let him go free even though he may technically be responsible for driving drunk and getting a few people killed.

  10. Heard def loses and Depp will lose, so in the end Depp loses big, because he will still be seen has a wife beater and Heard will do all the talk shows and tell everyone how he is persecuting her, ie, more sympathy. The woke media will defend her, even though they know she is lying and Depp is innocent.

  11. Knowing what we know about how the law is an ass. I have little hope for a JD win. We know bad guys walk and good guys don't. I just know how insane juries and judges am an be look at here in UK, complete fake trial with a corrupt judge who. Stepped down immediately after the case. Hmmmmm mm regardless. He has won in the peoples minds

  12. I believe the PITBULLSHITTER will continue to hurt and pursue Johnny, in one way or another. Because he's, truly, shown to have loved her, she's going to use his weaknesses against him. Just like how she set him up after the restraining order. He yielded to her demise. I've mentioned this before; "I would not doubt that she would walk up on Johnny in a crowd and stab him." Just because she is despreate. JOHNNY, "MUSCLE UP WITH SOME HUGE BODY GUARDS." Day and night. Especially, when you are sleeping and chilling at parties. Mafia boyz will disassemble her and her litter. I apologize if I am overreacting, but, I, don't trust her because of what's happening to some of the jury. And what happened to Ms Howell. Tighten up Johnny.

  13. At this point I don’t think it’s important who will win. Johnny Depp accomplished what he needed, his name and career is restored and Heard’ lies are exposed and she won’t be acting again

Leave a Reply to Ruby O’Sullivan Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here